Edudojo LogoEdudojo

For teachers and training providers

The AI that won’t think for you.

Edudojo’s coach asks students questions until the thinking is theirs. Teachers see how the work came together.

Catch our AI’s planted mistake

First pilot planned with Parishkar College, Jaipur.

Critical Thinking 101 · EssayDraft 1 · first attempt
Draft 1: A recent study shows that 70% of teachers believe phones reduce attention in class, which proves that phones are the main cause of falling exam results across the country.
Illustration based on a test essay in the Edudojo beta.

When AI can write the answer, the answer stops being the evidence. The process is.

How the method works

One piece of work, from first draft to teacher review.

Step 1: The coach asks. The student answers.

It points to the weak step and asks a question back. It never writes for the student.

The Socratic Coach

Coach · Critical Thinking 101

Student: Which sentence in my conclusion goes too far?

Coach: The last one. It assumes a ban is the only responsible choice. How could you compare schools with different phone policies?

Illustration of the student’s coach chat.

Step 2: The student revises and submits.

Every draft is saved. The student decides what changes.

Your draft

Editor

Critical Thinking 101

A phone ban may help some schools, but the evidence I have does not show it is the only responsible choice.

Version 2 of 2

Illustration of the student’s editor.

Step 3: The teacher opens the replay.

After submission, the teacher replays the drafts and the coach’s questions. Before class, Teacher Assistance helps them prepare.

The teacher's Replay

Submitted work · Critical Thinking 101 · Read-only

Removed: Any school that does not ban phones is choosing lower grades and more bullying for its students.

The coach asked: How could you compare schools with different phone policies?

Added: A phone ban may help some schools, but the evidence I have does not show it is the only responsible choice.

Illustration of the teacher’s read-only replay.

Red Team practice

Sometimes our AI is wrong on purpose. Can you catch it?

Students practise checking AI by catching it. Now and then the coach plants one small weak step, never announced.

How Red Team practice works

Try it

One step in this coach reply is weak on purpose.

Tap the step you doubt.

Is my 70% statistic convincing evidence for my claim?

A record teachers can read. Not a verdict.

What Edudojo is, and what it is not
It isIt is not
A coach that asks questionsA ghostwriter. The coach does not rewrite the work.
A record of drafts and coach chatAn AI detector, or proof of who wrote the work
Something teachers discuss with studentsA grade, a score or a ranking

Start with one class. Learn from real use.

Write to us
“Technology should challenge our minds to evolve, not replace our thinking.”
Gargeya Sharma, founder

In beta. No claim of learning efficacy, authorship verification or grading validity. Product views are illustrations. See the pilot plan