For training providers
Your certificate is only as credible as your assessment.
AI can now write the capstone. Edudojo's coach won't: it asks learners questions instead. Your reviewers read the drafts, the coach chat and how the work changed.
The capstone, two ways.
A reviewer sees only the final file. A detector can only guess, and a live review for every learner does not scale.
The submitted capstone
We chose a simple model because the larger one did no better on data it had not seen.
What a reviewer has today
Only the final file.
No drafts, no questions, no record of how it was made.
Who did the thinking?
With Edudojo, the path to it
Draft 1
Removed: We used the largest model, because bigger models are always more accurate.
Socratic Coach asks
How could you check that the larger model does better on data it has not seen?
Draft 2 · the final text above
How the path is kept.
01, Learner drafts
The learner drafts in Edudojo.
Drafts and revisions are saved as they go.
02, Socratic Coach asks
The coach asks; it never writes the answer.
Its questions are about the learner's own reasoning, and the chat is saved with the drafts.
03, Reviewer replays
The reviewer replays it after submission.
Alongside the final work, the reviewer assigned to that learner can open a read-only replay of how it developed, and use it to ask better questions.
At the review.
At a viva or a certificate decision, the Replay gives the reviewer something to ask about.
Open the learner's Replay.
The drafts and the Socratic Coach chat, in order, read-only.
Ask about the change between drafts.
Why did the claim change? What did the question make you check?
Decide.
The record informs; you judge. Edudojo does not grade or certify.
Try Edudojo with one cohort.
We are looking for a few training providers to try it with one real cohort, set up with the founder. No provider pilot is running yet.
Why the coach asks instead of answering: the method.